Did We Get The Right Privacy Tort?
This post first appeared at Privacy Perspectives on 15 May 2013. As Canadian privacy professionals will know, 2012 saw a significant development in Canadian tort law with respect to privacy. While some lower courts have recognized an “invasion of privacy” tort or said there might be one, higher courts refused to countenance the existence of such […]
Author:
emp
05 28th, 2013 in
Privacy
Comments Off on Did We Get The Right Privacy Tort?
FATCA Revisited
I’ve written about FATCA before, here and here, with respect to the privacy law implications of this American tax compliance initiative. However, I was recently presented with a letter on the subject that made me pause. A noted Canadian constitutional law expert has raised a rather interesting aspect and it seems what may get Canadian […]
Privacy Audits: The Subject of “Controls”
When one considers the subject of privacy audits, the first impulse is to ask about the purpose and scope of the audit, followed by a question as to what privacy controls are in play. While purpose and scope can be more readily defined, privacy controls are not a topic one sees addressed very much and […]
Author:
emp
03 18th, 2013 in
Privacy
Comments Off on Privacy Audits: The Subject of “Controls”
Are people expecting too much privacy from Cole?
Since the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) decision in R. v. Cole was issued in October 2012, I’ve seen press reports, blog posts and law firm newsletter articles talk about the existence of computer-related expectations of privacy in an employment context. This is somewhat contrary to the conventional wisdom that employers, with notice and through […]
Author:
emp
02 20th, 2013 in
Privacy
Comments Off on Are people expecting too much privacy from Cole?
Privacy, Employment & Vehicle Telematics
How can employers use locational information without running afoul of data protection laws? No doubt the question will appear more prominently in queries to lawyers as we evolve into a more technologically mobile society but the first place it comes up is in the context of motor vehicle telematics. “Telematics” refers to the merger of […]
Author:
emp
02 4th, 2013 in
Privacy
Comments Off on Privacy, Employment & Vehicle Telematics
Our regular schedule will resume shortly…
I’m pleased… Enormously pleased… Cannot tell you how pleased… To finally be able to say that the book manuscript has been submitted to the publisher earlier this week. Talk about something consuming an incredible amount of time and energy. I’m informed by the good folks at LexisNexis that The Law of Privacy will likely see the light […]
Author:
emp
01 24th, 2013 in
Notice
Comments Off on Our regular schedule will resume shortly…
A “Better Late Than Never” Update
Never write a book. I know I’ve not posted to this blog in what seems like an age. My explanation is two-fold. First, I’m working on a book on privacy law in Canada for Lexis Nexis. Between a very busy practice and that book, the blog…well, let’s just say it moved down in priority this […]
Author:
emp
11 13th, 2012 in
News
Comments Off on A “Better Late Than Never” Update
“GPS Jones” Decision: Not What It Seems
If you follow privacy law, you’ve probably heard about the case of U.S. v. Jones. This American decision, issued last week, is the US Supreme Court’s latest take on technology and privacy. A 9-0 decision, the justices got to the same place by different routes. Unfortunately, for a GPS-related decision, it turns out not to […]
Author:
emp
02 1st, 2012 in
Privacy
Comments Off on “GPS Jones” Decision: Not What It Seems
Data Privacy Day 2012
I had the the pleasure of serving as the keynote speaker at Dalhousie University’s 2012 Data Privacy Day last Wednesday in Halifax. My topic was eHealth and Privacy: Issues & Implications For Society. I’m informed a webcast will be posted at some point so if you’re interested, I’ll post the URL when I receive it. The […]
Ontario Recognizes Tort of Invasion of Privacy
Ontario’s Court of Appeal has issued its decision in Jones v Tsige and the result recognizes a common law tort of invasion of privacy. More technically, the court recognized a “right of action for intrusion upon seclusion” – one of several aspects of privacy.